wyldrstallyns

Ah, I see you’re thinking like a researcher and not as an oppressor, fellow anon.

The former focuses on evidence-supported results, and rightfully so, whereas the latter barely aims at a hint of the flimsiest legal precedence in “identifying” individuals before “confirming” they’re “terrorists”.

In short, the implied argument that positive ID of a target individual within said structure is paramount for a kill order is irresponsibly naive, but I hear the hope that fuels it.

Untold numbers of innocents are slaughtered every single year in gov’t sanctioned events based on intel that was half-assed/hurried/redacted (or deliberately poisoned), and we’re generally only seeing the ones that the “police” murder without consequence. (Though, with the advent of televising military actions via “news” programming, we can now see those bootlickers murder civilians w/ barely an “oopsie”, too.)

No. This tech is already more than functional for their needs, and has been for at least a generation now, if not longer.

If anyone reading this is still on the fence, I suggest you take a more critical look at the wording in the reports of said innocents’ deaths.

The “wrong place, wrong time” excuse is disgustingly pervasive, and in flagrant (and intentional) disregard for the victims in their own homes, cars, workplace, school, et al. —nevermind the indefensible fact that none of them had anything to do with the stated intent of said police/military activity.

To sum up: they’ll “ID” the target, label it hostile, and rush to play Momma’s Favorite Crusader on whomever the lucky innocent is that day. Could be any of us, and statistically will be, if things keep escalating along this arc.

You must realize that those undermine your point, right?

I believe you’re conflating the goal of isolating humanoid masses inside a structure with mapping of the interior space. Please, do your own research. It won’t take you very long to discover that the former has been in use for decades already, in both military and municipal capacities. I’m not here to argue opinions or feelings, and would welcome citations for your stance. 🖖🏼

Then your claim that it’s “as close to sci-fi as we can get” is ridiculous, considering we’ve been that “close” for at least a generation —thereby making your “quantifier” useless at best. Maybe, next time you expect a logical response to your illogic, pass on voicing said opinion until you’ve had more time to think on it. 🤷🏼‍♂️

Do they? Dunno. “They” have been working hard on exactly this for well over 30yrs now… 🤷🏽‍♂️

You tell me. Look around at the world right now, and ask yourself: what do they not have unfathomable amounts of data on?

You’re gonna love what history says about that opinion, fellow anon. 🤢

a lot of train data to even recognize room let alone person.

That data exists in abundance and it’s even available for purchase in small (consumer) or massive (corp) lots.

Possible but not feasible.

Inaccurate, but I can dig the hope behind it.

FWIW, Through-the-Wall surveillance (TWS) was discovered waaaay back. Here’s a few:

1.) (1842) American physicist, Joseph Henry, noticed that the discharge of a Leyden jar in his first-floor laboratory successfully magnetized needles in the basement, passing through two 14-inch-thick ceilings

2.) (1990s) “Through wall sensing addresses the desire to see inside structure to determine the layout of buildings, where occupants may be, and even identify objects within…”

3.) (< 2005) DARPA’s VisiBuilding handheld "…useful during a range of operations—from pre-mission planning to find which buildings should be searched, through post-mission analysis to find hidden objects or people."

4.) (2006) "…the TimeDomain system, which uses ultrawide band radar TWS technology. Because radar currently is blocked by metal walls or aluminum-backed insulation, an acoustic capability would allow the TWS device to provide some surveillance capability to penetrate through those walls.

Etc., etc.

p.s. IIRC, hats made of tinfoil would not only fail to deflect incoming “mind-control” signals, but they’d create sort of a convection oven on your brain by reflecting said waves back down afterward. Just sayin’.

Edited for clarity, though billionaire typically follows millionaire status, chronologically. I’m all for the reverse, and then some.

Dunno, maybe tax them into bankruptcy, maybe?! Fuckin’ leeches, every single one of 'em. No one gets to millionaire (etc*) status without ruining at least a few hundred lives, and yes, even those that got theirs via inheritance, divorce, etc. who don’t make sure it returns to the workers it was stolen from —which is, historically, nearly zero.

but it is an incredible value, and it doesn’t phone home or any other nonsense.

This right here. Especially the last bit. ☝🏼

On the off-chance you have some experience with of, what’s your take on Vivaldi, currently?

(edit: super curious, but how recent of an ex-reddirper would one have to be to downvote a simple request for honest input in a place where they don’t matter? Asking for a friend.)